Posted by
Eaglewings on Saturday, October 21, 2006 12:28:05 AM
It is interesting to see how the two parties differ in their approach of dealing with sex offenses. The Wall Street Journal
recently ran a story concerning sexual misbehavior by six congressmen
over the past three decades: three Democrats and three Republicans.
For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed. Therefore
the Lord shall have no joy in their young men, neither shall have mercy
on their fatherless and widows: for every one is an hypocrite and an
evildoer, and every mouth speaketh folly. For all this his anger is not
turned away, but his hand is stretched out still. Isaiah 9:16 and 17 (KJV)
Let
me see if I completely understand all this Foleygate stuff. He has
admitted that he is a Roman Catholic, homosexual, “child predator”, who
resigned in disgrace and we are bashing him why?
Because he is Roman Catholic? Well it is totally acceptable in our
current political society to bash Catholics after all we darn near
burned the POPE in effigy for reading history about old world Islam.
Well it must be because as a Roman Catholic he was “engaging in
pedophilia”, and this is new? I thought it was acceptable for Catholics
to molest young altar boys? Catholic Bishops have been moving pedophile
Priests around from parish to parish for years.
It couldn’t be because he is a homosexual could it? Gay bashing is
politically incorrect and considered a hate crime. Are all these people
who are bashing Foley going to be brought up on charges of hate crimes?
Perhaps it is because he was molested by a Catholic Priest while
young? Again where did he learn his behavior from? Apparently it is
acceptable to be a practicing, homosexual, pedophile, Roman Catholic,
because he is still a member in good standing, proudly proclaiming that
fact while being removed from office.
All we seem to know is that he was having virtual sex (talking dirty
on the internet) with supposedly young pages, who did not know he was a
creepy old guy? Am I supposed to believe that these pages were not
laughing their backsides off at this old creepy guy sending dirty
messages over the internet? It wasn’t like he actually had real sex. We
did not consider phone sex with Monica to be a offense worth removing
one from office when Bill Clinton did it. After all his personal life
should not matter to his public life right?
If the church won’t ex-communicate Foley, if the homosexual
community will not rise up and ban sexual advances on young boys, and
if the democrats will not kick out their homosexual members than
perhaps they should just sit back and remain quiet like they have all
the times before.